Minor league baseball MLB free agency puts the “R” in WAR

DENVER, CO - SEPTEMBER 17: Erick Aybar
DENVER, CO - SEPTEMBER 17: Erick Aybar
3 of 3
Minor league baseball
TORONTO, ON – JUNE 30: Blaine Boyer

Minor league baseball: Analyzing the pitchers

The results are similar for pitchers:

Year T-2:

132 pitchers

Average: 74 IP, 0.4 fWAR, 0.3 rWAR

Year T-1:

140 pitchers

Average: 63 IP, 0.1 fWAR, -0.1 rWAR

Year T:

148 pitchers

Average: 47 IP, 0.2 fWAR, 0.2 rWAR

Year T+1:

80 pitchers

Average: 60 IP, 0.4 fWAR, 0.3 rWAR

More from Call to the Pen

Like the position player group, the worst season for these pitchers is the year before they sign minor league contracts (T-1). That’s the biased year. Coming off bad seasons, these players don’t get big contract offers and have to settle for a minor league contract and invitation to spring training. They bounce back and provide slightly above replacement-level value.

Based on these real-life players over a 10-year period, it appears that MLB teams who sign free agents to minor league contracts get slightly more production than the WAR baseline would expect out of what are, essentially, replacement-level players (based on how easy they were to acquire). It’s possible that the WAR baseline is slightly low. Perhaps instead of .294, it should be .300 or .310.

The difference is small, though, and there are other factors to consider. The sample of players could be biased. My player pool came from the ESPN link that shows minor league free agent signings. I don’t know if their list is complete. Most years had 20 or more such signings, but the link for 2012 only had a few, which seems odd to me.

Next: ACES agency accused of providing MLB players with PEDs

Another group of Minor league baseball players who could be added to the pool are offseason waiver claims. Perhaps if these players had been added, the outcome would be different. Overall, though, based on 10 years of data, these minor league free agent signings who get major league playing time perform slightly better than replacement level.