2019 MLB Season: Rating the NL Central general managers

Chicago Cubs manager Joe Maddon, team president Theo Epstein and general manager Jed Hoyer speak Tuesday, Feb. 12, 2019 as the team reports to spring training in Mesa, Ariz (Brian Cassella/Chicago Tribune/Tribune News Service via Getty Images)
Chicago Cubs manager Joe Maddon, team president Theo Epstein and general manager Jed Hoyer speak Tuesday, Feb. 12, 2019 as the team reports to spring training in Mesa, Ariz (Brian Cassella/Chicago Tribune/Tribune News Service via Getty Images) /
facebooktwitterreddit
Prev
2 of 6
Next
Cleveland Indians
(Photo by Dilip Vishwanat/Getty Images) /

2019 MLB Season: The NL Central’s best GM

Mike Girsch (and John Mozeliak), St. Louis Cardinals

Because it involved a perennial All-Star, the December trade that brought Paul Goldschmidt to the middle of the Cardinal order is widely viewed as the centerpiece move in the Girsch-Mozeliak effort to restore the Cardinals at a place of prominence in the NL Central.

Following a disappointing first couple of months, Goldschmidt did piece together a representative, if not an exceptional season. He batted .260 – that’s 30 points off his career average – but delivered 34 home runs and 97 RBIs.

Statistically, however, the more substantive contributions involved a couple of farm system products. Following a spasmodic baptism in the bullpen last season, Dakota Hudson earned a full-time rotation spot this spring and turned in a 16-7 record in 32 starts. That translated to a +0.8 WAA.

Then in June, the Cardinals summoned Tommy Edman from Triple-A to take over third base for a slumping Matt Carpenter. Edman batted .304 and lit a fuse under the sometimes balky Cardinal offense, his performance translating to 2.7 WAA.  Were it not for Pete Alonso, a plausible case could be made for Edman as National League Rookie of The Year.

Most of the rest of what Girsch/Mozeliak did qualified as ordinary. Setting aside Goldschmidt, Hudson, and Edman, the Cardinals used a modest 13 players they had obtained in one fashion or another since the end of the 2018 season. None of those 13 produced a WAA better than +0.5 or worse than -0.7.

Short-term acquisitions: +0.5

Short-term trade losses: -0.9

Short-term free agent signings: -0.3

Short-term free agent losses: +1.5

Short-term rookie production: +3.7

Short-term total: +4.5