Rating MLB general managers: The AL Central

Dec 12, 2017; Orlando, FL, USA; Chicago White Sox general manager Rick Hahn talks with media at Walt Disney World Swan and Dolphin Resort. Mandatory Credit: Kim Klement-USA TODAY Sports
Dec 12, 2017; Orlando, FL, USA; Chicago White Sox general manager Rick Hahn talks with media at Walt Disney World Swan and Dolphin Resort. Mandatory Credit: Kim Klement-USA TODAY Sports /
facebooktwitterreddit
Prev
1 of 6
Next

When considering each general manager in the AL Central, their 2021 performance precisely mirrored the division standings. Rick Hahn, leader of the division champion Chicago White, turned in the best job of gathering talent and dumping non-talent, while Thad Levine of the last place Minnesota Twins had the worst.

Our standard for evaluating the performance of a general manager (or other chief executive who holds a functionally similar title) is simple. We attach a value to every personnel move made since the conclusion of the 2020 season last October. The sum of the values is the GM’s rating.

The value is determined by the Wins Above Average (WAA) generated by the player during 2021. WAA is an offshoot of WAR, and it is ideal for this purpose because unlike WAR it is zero-based. That means if we say a GM impacted his team by +2.5 games in 2021, he cumulatively improved his team’s fortunes by that many games.

Conversely, a GM with a negative cumulative WAA can be said to have hurt his team’s pennant prospects by that amount.

Broadly speaking, an MLB general manager can impact his team in any of five ways: by the trades, purchase, and waiver claims he makes, by his free agent signings or extensions, by his farm system callups, by the players he trades away, and by the players he releases or loses to free agency.

Each general manager should, of course, be judged in the context of what they are attempting to accomplish. As an example, Cubs general manager Jed Hoyer conducted a mid-season tear-down of his roster that was virtually guaranteed to produce a negative rating for Hoyer by season’s end.

Hoyer would probably be OK with that; the moves were designed for future, not present impact.

In the end, the best way to understand the rating is this: It tells how much better or worse a GM made his team’s roster compared with what would have occurred had he (or in the case of the Miami Marlins, she) done nothing at all.

For that reason, the ratings do not necessarily correlate with the final MLB standings. Some GMs are starting from a better position than others.

With that as an explanation, here’s how the five AL Central general managers scored in 2021.